by Robert L. Gisel
An antisocial person can be expected to shoot the wrong target. This is an evidently unknown behavior trait that is destroying fair play in our schools.
In a Delaware school a first grader is given 45 days suspension for bringing his favorite camping utensils to school to eat his lunch. He is an alive, bright, and high IQ lad, I'd say, judging by his photo look. He looks a lot like myself as a first grader, when I topped all third graders in the county on my SAT scores.
Even then I was guilty in a first grade incident of bringing guns to school. Playing with my favorite 2-gun holsters, cap guns I won in the church bingo game, I forget I'm wearing these when I get on the school bus. At school, to cover up my embarrassment, I hide them behind the hot water heater in the basement. Great plan, until the teacher decided to have the students all help clean the basement for the upcoming box lunch raffle. When these are found and the question is put forth whose are these, in front of the entire school body I have to admit they are mine. Very embarrassing moment.
In today's school district I would have been suspended from school or expelled for bringing guns into the school. Zachary Christie, 6, was suspended for 45 days and relegated to the alternative school for grossly bad kids. All Zachory wanted was to eat his lunch with special three-way knife-fork-spoon utensil. Actually, I'm surprised he wasn't arrested, the way attitudes have degenerated so far in our school system.
A friend reminded me recently that when we were in Junior High in Alaska we'd watch the High Schoolers bring their guns to school for the fully sanctioned Rifle Club. I almost joined that one myself but was too busy working after school, participating in the bowling club and performing in our dance band and also a folk group. These students though, they'd walk into the school carrying their rifles which they would store in their school lockers until time for the Club meet. Then they'd take their guns out of their lockers and carry them through the Junior High School to the basement rifle range.
Try that today with Security standing guard at the door with metal detector screening and frisking. How did it get so crazy? Psyche influence.
This is a stark new reality previously unviewed. The sequence goes like this:
1) Trying to study past misunderstood word and concepts,
2) Nervous and other non-optimum reactions occur,
3) For which the psychiatrist gives a bogus prognosis of ADHD or ADD,
4) This is always followed by a prescription for psychotropic drugs,
5) Which cause more violent reactions like suicide or school shootings and
6) Now the school grounds are placed under martial law and cloaked in an atmosphere of intolerance.
There are very real physiological reactions proven to result from barriers to study. Studying past misunderstood and undefined words causes disinterest, a not-there-ness, and blankness. One can feel washed-out with a nervous sort of hysteria. After numbers of such bypassed definitions one gets pretty detached, starts looking out the window and then gets rather irritable, even quite critical of the subject and the area of the subject and you want to blow from the premises. Sound familiar?
The psychiatric solution is to label the student on the spot. With no testing or scientific support of any kind whatsoever. This process is so arbitrary it is genuinely crazy.
The handling is simple: ban the fraudulent psyches from the schools and refuse to allow psychotropic drugging of the students. Implement a scientifically correct study technology. Our schools would calm instantly and common sense would again prevail.
Zachary's mother refused to let him be degraded by the ready injustice at the school. My hat is off to her.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Thursday, September 17, 2009
A New Hyper-Depressant Drug to Treat Depression
by Robert L. Gisel
When someone is seriously depressed they will be emotionally in apathy or an attitude like "dying". In other words there is a high likelihood they could be suicidal. Obviously the thing to give them for this condition is a drug that increases the possibility of suicide, right?
Big Pharma thinks so and the FDA plays right along with that. One of the newest antidepressant drugs, Pristiq, has been recently released on the market with the approval of the FDA, who turns around and now black-box labels the drug for life threatening reasons.
The data is sketchy whether this is due to side effects now showing up, meaning adverse events on real patients in lieu of clinical testing now reveal the "oversight", or that the side effects were known from the original clinical testing, in which case the FDA neglected to read the findings when the approval was given. One other possibility: the FDA is staffed by dissolute and unprincipled traitors.
This new anti-depressant drug, Pristiq, has the usual psyche-drug side effects, such as increased tendency to suicide and violence, but it has some new ones I hadn't seen in predecessors. These include dangerously low blood pressure, abnormal bleeding, seizure, to name a few. FDA approved this for release? This is nuts.
Maybe we can call 911 and have the approving FDA officers arrested by a SWAT Team for collusion to sell illicit drugs.
When someone is seriously depressed they will be emotionally in apathy or an attitude like "dying". In other words there is a high likelihood they could be suicidal. Obviously the thing to give them for this condition is a drug that increases the possibility of suicide, right?
Big Pharma thinks so and the FDA plays right along with that. One of the newest antidepressant drugs, Pristiq, has been recently released on the market with the approval of the FDA, who turns around and now black-box labels the drug for life threatening reasons.
The data is sketchy whether this is due to side effects now showing up, meaning adverse events on real patients in lieu of clinical testing now reveal the "oversight", or that the side effects were known from the original clinical testing, in which case the FDA neglected to read the findings when the approval was given. One other possibility: the FDA is staffed by dissolute and unprincipled traitors.
This new anti-depressant drug, Pristiq, has the usual psyche-drug side effects, such as increased tendency to suicide and violence, but it has some new ones I hadn't seen in predecessors. These include dangerously low blood pressure, abnormal bleeding, seizure, to name a few. FDA approved this for release? This is nuts.
Maybe we can call 911 and have the approving FDA officers arrested by a SWAT Team for collusion to sell illicit drugs.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Want to Bet it Was Meds?
by Robert L. Gisel
This story, advanced as the story of a hero, has a hidden meaning.
A 14 year old girl boards a bus headed to school with a .357 semi-automatic pistol threatening to shoot. A high school football player bravely makes himself a target while he gets the younger kids out the emergency door in the back and talks the girl down until he tackles her and grabs the gun. Saves 22 school kids.
The question is, what would prompt a 14 year old girl to do that? Meds. Prozac. Ritalin. Zoloft. And a dozen dozen derivatives altered only enough to change the name while keeping the same destructive side effects.
Watch the news feeds. No doubt the story will out that she was labeled by the psyches and put on "meds". The same group of "meds" that have been attributed to all the other school shootings due to their side effects prompting homicidal violence and suicide.
When will they ever learn: these psychotropic drugs don't cure insanity -- they cause it.
This story, advanced as the story of a hero, has a hidden meaning.
A 14 year old girl boards a bus headed to school with a .357 semi-automatic pistol threatening to shoot. A high school football player bravely makes himself a target while he gets the younger kids out the emergency door in the back and talks the girl down until he tackles her and grabs the gun. Saves 22 school kids.
The question is, what would prompt a 14 year old girl to do that? Meds. Prozac. Ritalin. Zoloft. And a dozen dozen derivatives altered only enough to change the name while keeping the same destructive side effects.
Watch the news feeds. No doubt the story will out that she was labeled by the psyches and put on "meds". The same group of "meds" that have been attributed to all the other school shootings due to their side effects prompting homicidal violence and suicide.
When will they ever learn: these psychotropic drugs don't cure insanity -- they cause it.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Psychiatric Drug Death Rates Worsen In Children
by Robert L. Gisel
A new FDA study reveals alarming results of the use of Ritalin and like ADHD Drugs. The report? To quote Jenny Thomson in her HSI Alert,
"It showed that Ritalin and other ADHD drugs may increase the risk of SUDDEN DEATH in children by a staggering 600%!
"Let that sink in: A 600% increase in sudden, unexplained death... in children! From the FDA's OWN study"Even more alarming is the response by the FDA - discredit their own reporting methods rather than take the life threatening drug off the shelf.
The FDA has been quick to take off the shelves products such as tomatoes in a salmonella scare (when it turns out it had nothing to do with tomatoes after all). Ritalin and derivative psychotropic drugs have even been black box labeled by the FDA. With a side effect of a of possible sudden and "unexplained" death, statistically showing a 600% increase, one would expect these to be banned entirely. This is no minor issue and probably should be investigated as a gross malfeasance of office.
ADHD labelling itself is a farce. The use of narcotic psychotropic drugs to "treat" a fallacious and arbitrary diagnosis is criminal. The actual causes of the phenomena the drugs are purported to treat come from something else. In some cases the symptoms have simply been found to be related to school lunch menus that leave the students malnourished. Placing a child on a regular dose of drugs, listed as schedule II controlled substance the equivalent of heroine, on a psychiatrists opinion, based on no factual evidence or scientific study, is utterly insane.
Are you ready to risk the life of your child or grandchild on the high percentages that the treatment will kill him? Needlessly?
It is imperative that we speak out against this in every avenue. Your voice heard by one who tells one other and so on down the line will have an impact.
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Two Hours of Life
by Robert L. Gisel
February 21st, 2009 Mathew Schultz died two hours after birth from prenatal exposure to the psychiatric narcotic antidepressant Effexor. We can expect a lot more of this if the MOTHER's Act gains a foothold.
It works like this.
1) The psychiatrist evaluates someone, a mother pre- or post-natal,
2) invariably a diagnosis includes labelling, from one or more of 3000-plus "diseases" in the DSM II,
3) the psychiatric diagnostic does not include any examination for vitamin deficiencies or pathological causes,
4) a psychotropic drug, ranking at the same level as heroine, is automatically prescribed as the medical handling,
5) the patient becomes addicted to the drug, as it is a schedule II narcotic, and,
6) side effects are experienced considerably worse than the bit of misemotion the mother was experiencing in the first place.
Mathew Schultz is one of the side effects. No remorse or regrets can be expected to come from the prescribing psychiatrist. The drug companies will spend a fortune to convince courts this had nothing to do with them.
Say NO to the MOTHER's Act. It's a killer.
February 21st, 2009 Mathew Schultz died two hours after birth from prenatal exposure to the psychiatric narcotic antidepressant Effexor. We can expect a lot more of this if the MOTHER's Act gains a foothold.
It works like this.
1) The psychiatrist evaluates someone, a mother pre- or post-natal,
2) invariably a diagnosis includes labelling, from one or more of 3000-plus "diseases" in the DSM II,
3) the psychiatric diagnostic does not include any examination for vitamin deficiencies or pathological causes,
4) a psychotropic drug, ranking at the same level as heroine, is automatically prescribed as the medical handling,
5) the patient becomes addicted to the drug, as it is a schedule II narcotic, and,
6) side effects are experienced considerably worse than the bit of misemotion the mother was experiencing in the first place.
Mathew Schultz is one of the side effects. No remorse or regrets can be expected to come from the prescribing psychiatrist. The drug companies will spend a fortune to convince courts this had nothing to do with them.
Say NO to the MOTHER's Act. It's a killer.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Questions for the President
by Robert L. Gisel
Another email came to me from the President. These emails from "Barack Obama" make one feel important, even if it's really only from Mitch, his promoter, and I'm just one recipient amongst multimilions. However, since I never receive any personal replies to my direct reply letters to Mr. Obama I post my letters on my blog so I know it gets seen by someone anyway.
Here is my latest letter, intended for, but possibly never to be seen by the President.
To: Mitch Stewart, BarackObama.com
Subject: Ask the President a health care question
Dear Mitch,
Lest I do not have an opportunity to record and post a video, you can see my input in the blog post below.
http://favoringlife.blogspot.com/2009/07/until-death-do-us-part.html
By the way, I know that the psyche-drugs in question don't do nothing. They do make the recipients more docile and controllable. If that is one's intention then there you go. At the risk of losing creativity, vibrant life and dynamic future leaders. You can see I don't think very highly of these and don't mince my words.
At the risk of unbearable candor and forthrightness, is Barack Obama on psychiatric drugs? I realize this a very personal and maybe biting question. But seriously, has he ever taken these psychotropic drugs? Are his children, or their school chums, on them? Would you take them, knowing the published, dangerous, side effects, such as ideation of suicide and homocide, sudden unexplained death and health problems?
This is relevant to the issue of more affordable health care as the billions budgeted for psychiatric programs in the schools and other health care programs to forward the use of psychotropic narcotics are wasted funds. Funds that could be used to provide more general family heath care. And yes, it is a matter of life or death, so who cares about the whines of psychiatrists having their fraudulent budgets cut.
My concern is genuine, albiet frankly direct. Perhaps you might give me your feedback and even advise the President that change is wanted. And possible. It is not from one voice that I speak to you.
Respectfully yours,
Robert L. Gisel
Another email came to me from the President. These emails from "Barack Obama" make one feel important, even if it's really only from Mitch, his promoter, and I'm just one recipient amongst multimilions. However, since I never receive any personal replies to my direct reply letters to Mr. Obama I post my letters on my blog so I know it gets seen by someone anyway.
Here is my latest letter, intended for, but possibly never to be seen by the President.
To: Mitch Stewart, BarackObama.com
Subject: Ask the President a health care question
Dear Mitch,
Lest I do not have an opportunity to record and post a video, you can see my input in the blog post below.
http://favoringlife.blogspot.com/2009/07/until-death-do-us-part.html
By the way, I know that the psyche-drugs in question don't do nothing. They do make the recipients more docile and controllable. If that is one's intention then there you go. At the risk of losing creativity, vibrant life and dynamic future leaders. You can see I don't think very highly of these and don't mince my words.
At the risk of unbearable candor and forthrightness, is Barack Obama on psychiatric drugs? I realize this a very personal and maybe biting question. But seriously, has he ever taken these psychotropic drugs? Are his children, or their school chums, on them? Would you take them, knowing the published, dangerous, side effects, such as ideation of suicide and homocide, sudden unexplained death and health problems?
This is relevant to the issue of more affordable health care as the billions budgeted for psychiatric programs in the schools and other health care programs to forward the use of psychotropic narcotics are wasted funds. Funds that could be used to provide more general family heath care. And yes, it is a matter of life or death, so who cares about the whines of psychiatrists having their fraudulent budgets cut.
My concern is genuine, albiet frankly direct. Perhaps you might give me your feedback and even advise the President that change is wanted. And possible. It is not from one voice that I speak to you.
Respectfully yours,
Robert L. Gisel
Saturday, July 4, 2009
Until Death Do Us Part
by Robert L. Gisel
Some children may never grow to say those words in the traditional ritual of marriage ceremony. Those referred to are the ones who have a sudden and unpredicted death, compliments of psychiatry. As the psychotropic drugs medicating greater and greater numbers of unsuspecting and probably even unwilling children have been linked to sudden deaths, this is no melodramatic statement.
This article came to me from The Daily Dose, one of the feeds I receive regularly, illustrating knowledge that this situation is getting to be more widely known, albiet not enough yet to significantly stem the tide of systematic psychotropic drugging of America's kids:
"A new study funded by the FDA and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) claims that kids taking ADHD drugs such as Ritalin and Adderal are many times more likely to die suddenly and for unexplained reasons that kids who aren't on these drugs.
"I've been telling you for some time how dangerous these drugs are. But this new announcement about links to unexplained sudden death is by far the most extreme. And as sad as this is, it's hardly surprising. Ritalin is no lightweight narcotic -- it's a schedule II controlled substance (like cocaine) and the possible consequences of taking this drug include heart attacks, growth problems, and psychosis.
"And now you can add death to the list."
Okay, not every child on "Meds" is going to die suddenly. At 1 in 10,000 of the over 2.5 million US children on Ritilin type drugs this is only about 250 (!) unwarranted child deaths. Internationally 2000 school age deaths can be anticipated at the rate discovered by the FDA study. If it were only your own child, or your grandchild, would you be inclined to allow the dispensing of these drugs knowing the possible side effect is death? How many times would you have to hear this before you put up a good hearty protest? Or do you think it can't happen to you and yours?
Bear in mind the use of the "Meds" sometimes encompasses multiple, simultaneous, derivitive prescriptions placing the kid on several psyche-drugs at the same time! This is, factually, unchecked criminal mal-practice.
In light of the fact that our government is still heavily funding these "treatment" programs but also our now President himself has been one of the most ardent supporters of psychiatry by his Congressional Record standings these are indications that a great deal of work is yet to be done to rid society of the scourge. Speaking out against it in every avenue is the first step.
Some children may never grow to say those words in the traditional ritual of marriage ceremony. Those referred to are the ones who have a sudden and unpredicted death, compliments of psychiatry. As the psychotropic drugs medicating greater and greater numbers of unsuspecting and probably even unwilling children have been linked to sudden deaths, this is no melodramatic statement.
This article came to me from The Daily Dose, one of the feeds I receive regularly, illustrating knowledge that this situation is getting to be more widely known, albiet not enough yet to significantly stem the tide of systematic psychotropic drugging of America's kids:
"A new study funded by the FDA and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) claims that kids taking ADHD drugs such as Ritalin and Adderal are many times more likely to die suddenly and for unexplained reasons that kids who aren't on these drugs.
"I've been telling you for some time how dangerous these drugs are. But this new announcement about links to unexplained sudden death is by far the most extreme. And as sad as this is, it's hardly surprising. Ritalin is no lightweight narcotic -- it's a schedule II controlled substance (like cocaine) and the possible consequences of taking this drug include heart attacks, growth problems, and psychosis.
"And now you can add death to the list."
Okay, not every child on "Meds" is going to die suddenly. At 1 in 10,000 of the over 2.5 million US children on Ritilin type drugs this is only about 250 (!) unwarranted child deaths. Internationally 2000 school age deaths can be anticipated at the rate discovered by the FDA study. If it were only your own child, or your grandchild, would you be inclined to allow the dispensing of these drugs knowing the possible side effect is death? How many times would you have to hear this before you put up a good hearty protest? Or do you think it can't happen to you and yours?
Bear in mind the use of the "Meds" sometimes encompasses multiple, simultaneous, derivitive prescriptions placing the kid on several psyche-drugs at the same time! This is, factually, unchecked criminal mal-practice.
In light of the fact that our government is still heavily funding these "treatment" programs but also our now President himself has been one of the most ardent supporters of psychiatry by his Congressional Record standings these are indications that a great deal of work is yet to be done to rid society of the scourge. Speaking out against it in every avenue is the first step.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
