by Robert L. Gisel
Really I do try to stay out of politics. That's hard to do when the consequence of political action denies freedoms and rights. Being required by law to the enslavement of addicting highly narcotic psychiatric drugs sends up red flags on the encroachment of life.
Psychiatric diagnosis means labeling means prescription to addictive psychiatric drugs. I have been prompted to blog after the recent news I have heard for which I must protest. I searched but found no way to email Obama from his website but I was able to email McCain. They looked like friends the way they shook hands after the debate so I ask McCain to pass on my letter thus:
Senator McCain:
I was unable to find any "contact us" or email link to Barack Obama on his official site, but you see him around at debates etc. Would you forward this to him for me?
Dear Senator Obama,
Some news was just passed to me that greatly concerns me. No, it actually alarms me.
It was told to me you are stoutly pro-psychiatry, that you have more pro votes for those cronies and even bills you co-sponsored than any other Senator. Like the Mother's Act that you co-sponsored (thank God that one was defeated) to require psychiatric examination and evaluation after and before pregnancy for post partum or pre-post partum depression.
Is this true? Or even partly true? Just wait until the hockey mom hears about this, that she was that close to being prescribed black box labeled psychiatric drugs at her last delivery.
These drugs are addictive narcotics that rank on the drug classifications tables as more severe than cocaine. Make no mistake about it, the goal is not evaluation: it is addiction to their drugs that the psychiatrists want.
It was even told to me that on two score psychiatric related bills favoring psychiatric misdeeds Senator McCain voted No and you voted Yes.
You are possibly too young to remember Segregation brought to us by psychiatry. What a mess that was for decades!
The entire rationale for that era came from a vote with no scientific evidence by the American Psychiatric Association. This "mental health disease" had no basis in fact, yet it was put on the list of all mental heath diseases, the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM), to justify the Segregation Movement.
Brace yourself for burning truth. I'm going to tell you what they named it. "Negroitis". This is NOT A JOKE - it is on the list! This is the rationale that the Segregation laws and support were all based on.
Here is what psychiatrists said "Negroitis" is: it is a "Mental Health Disease" that turns your skin black and you are not cured of it until your skin turns white. Furthermore it could be contagious so blacks must be segregated from whites and not use the same water spigots and public facilities.
Nothing could be further from the truth!
This is not, repeat not, a prank, what I write to you here is documented. The best full documentation of this is with Freedom Magazine, go check it out.
It was a huge joke by the American Psychiatric Association and by it Segregation was put into law. Do you think it stopped there, this charade?
Today we have "ADHD" with no clinical test or scientific support. How about "Mathematics Syndrome"? Check your figures - you might have it! Here's your meds.
If you want a good laugh, get the DSM yourself and read it.
Today the APA has proclaimed the intention to put every school kid in America on their psych-drugs. Where do you think the school shootings come from? This is a published side effect of the now-black-box-labeled narcotic drugs Ritilin, Prosac and others. There is now a whole string of derivatives under different names and all are still as lethal.
Why would the FDA require posting of these warning labels? It 's because the side effects are tendency to violence and increased propensity to suicide. Violence and suicide.
One for one school shootings have been linked to these drugs and psychiatric evaluation. It is a true statistic: the more school kids on these "meds" the more school aged suicides. It is an embracive graph!
Maybe you have been, pardon me for bluntness, ignorant of these facts. Now you know them, if you have read this far in the letter. Really, you're off your rocker to be a friend of psychiatry. I'm sorry, I have to say it like it is.
I had (slightly) considered the idea of voting for you. I have friends who (mistakenly?) want to vote for you. Can you deny these searing rumors, say it isn't so, or denounce psychiatry now?
I must speak out loud and clear against anyone for President who believes any good can come from psychiatry who, by their own admission, has cured no one. Check your facts! And vote the other way.
This pains me. I am so nonpolitical that to now feel compelled to get politically involved and go national with this news is outside my preferences. Act fast I do, however, so I look forward to a rapid response.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Gisel
FavoringLife.com
P.S. Senator McCain, Thanks for passing this to Obama. If you won't see him soon just read it to the press, he'll get the message. It's okay to publish this. In fact please, please do.
P.P.S. Don't let Sarah see this as she will pit-bull him for real!
So, I publish another outspoken blog post. No doubt the APA would like to label me crazy to shut me up. I will continue to have the courage to say what I observe. If you cherish your life keep it out of the hands of the psychs.
If you agree, or disagree, let me know in your comments here.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Church and State and Psychiatry
by Robert L. Gisel
As Freedom of Religion can never be divorced from the umbrella of human rights a Church/State can never be included in that arena, which is to say a theology goes against the grain of human rights and politics does not mix with religion. This point was aptly made by BellaOnline for the Independent Parties Site here: Why Faith and Policics Do Not Mix.
The essential issue needs to be taken a step further lest the deepest truth be missed.
Cynthia Phillips argues that a Church/State inevitably falls into bias of it's own and therefore the intolerance of others. These are my own words but should catch the essence of what Cynthia says. Historically this proves out and goes without saying.
Huckabee's statement of the intention of "taking this nation back for Christ" indeed seems a departure from our First Amendment. If in giving the benefit of the doubt of possible misunderstanding that this was intended figuratively by Mr. Huckabee, meaning that we need to revive spirituality in our nation and restore humanity to man, I totally concur. Huckabee's statement however smacks of separatism from and intolerance for others' beliefs, starting presumably with the Islamic Muslims.
Religion and human rights go hand in hand as both require at their pinnacle omniscience and omnipotence, the allness of all. Rarely ever, or never, have we seen a sovereign government exhibit such magnificence.
To put this all in contrastive perspective one need only trace the deviate train of thought back to it's ominous and unseen source: psychiatry. Lest one think this non-sequitur to the issue of Church and State realize we are talking about basic values intrinsic to humankind and on the other hand a dastardly group that has vowed to destroy those values.
In 1945 psychiatrist G. Brock Chisholm to the assembly of psychiatrists emulated J.R Rees' 1940 master plan as the guiding principle for psychiatry, their paramount aim as "reinterpretation and eventually [the] eradication of right and wrong". This arrogant agenda laid out in detail includes the dissolution of family values and religious belief as essential to accomplishment of their goals. That's the downside of this issue.
Psychiatric mainline activities, addictive narcotic psychiatric drugs, prefrontal lobotomy, insulin shock and electroshock therapy each one inflicts pain and unconsciousness. These are highly destructive activities to the body, mind and spirit of the patient. It is not healthy - mentally or physically. Besides that, these violate human rights, considering that the practices are fraudulent and have never cured anyone by psychiatry's own admission. Without rehashing the volumes of documentation behind the above statements make a note of this: where there is a keenly unfavorable activity to advance militant ethnicity, separatism and otherness particularly in religious intolerance there is, if one looks deeply enough, a psychiatrist in the woodpile.
Ethnic cleansing, that heinous fabrication of psychiatry, also could said to be, by association, religious cleansing. Advancement of humanity to humankind does not admit to another religious crusade so let's don't go there.
That the Roman Catholic Church's heavy involvement in psychiatric therapy is found in parallel with its group's moral difficulties of sexual abuse among it's priests as a present crisis issue is no wonder. I trust the Pope will work it out, if he recognizes that the undermining of values is coming from the psychiatric false data rampant in our society and the reliance of the Catholic Church on psychiatry.
Following through on Rees's master plan psychiatry has no good will towards religions. Even to this day as we witness the Child Protection racket in Texas under psychiatric rule engage in human rights violations in mass against the families of that Mormon sect.
That said my main point can be made. Central to human concourse is the recognition of human rights inclusive of the inalienable right to one's own religious practices and their performance. Our country's First Amendment groups the freedom of religion with other specific rights such as the freedom of speech while the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights lists these each separately in the 30 specifically stated rights. Unstated here but a necessary corollary is that the souls of men have the rights of men.
You can't get more basic than embracing life as that of spiritual beings, that each and every one of us is basically good and is a spiritual being, a soul or spirit, call it what you will. Psychiatrists notwithstanding (joke). Spiritual being to spiritual being it matters naught to me whether the individuals before me prefer Mohammad or Christ or Buddha or L. Ron Hubbard. I see these groupings of man pursuing the same goals: desires to advance spirituality, basic truth and the study of knowledge. This would naturally embrace the highest point from which one could view, the omniscience and omnipotence associated with God and pan determinism in the allness of all. This is the quintessential what goes around comes around.
The State, in the activities of any of its agencies, is a sovereignty that must hold its own by its might and symbology with some agreement of principles. We don't however need an army of a particular color to tell us how we can worship.
Thus anyone should be free to pursue their religious beliefs. The delineation of the inalienable human rights defines the boundaries against which the the path is directed for the furtherance of humanity to mankind.
Invest in yourself here:
______________________________________________
Winning The Tomorrow Game. Unique, In-depth Step-by-step Program For Achieving Your Dreams And Goals. Self-exploration, Dream-creation And Realization. Includes Helpful Workbook, 200+ Custom Affirmations. Click Here!____________________________________________________
As Freedom of Religion can never be divorced from the umbrella of human rights a Church/State can never be included in that arena, which is to say a theology goes against the grain of human rights and politics does not mix with religion. This point was aptly made by BellaOnline for the Independent Parties Site here: Why Faith and Policics Do Not Mix.
The essential issue needs to be taken a step further lest the deepest truth be missed.
Cynthia Phillips argues that a Church/State inevitably falls into bias of it's own and therefore the intolerance of others. These are my own words but should catch the essence of what Cynthia says. Historically this proves out and goes without saying.
Huckabee's statement of the intention of "taking this nation back for Christ" indeed seems a departure from our First Amendment. If in giving the benefit of the doubt of possible misunderstanding that this was intended figuratively by Mr. Huckabee, meaning that we need to revive spirituality in our nation and restore humanity to man, I totally concur. Huckabee's statement however smacks of separatism from and intolerance for others' beliefs, starting presumably with the Islamic Muslims.
Religion and human rights go hand in hand as both require at their pinnacle omniscience and omnipotence, the allness of all. Rarely ever, or never, have we seen a sovereign government exhibit such magnificence.
To put this all in contrastive perspective one need only trace the deviate train of thought back to it's ominous and unseen source: psychiatry. Lest one think this non-sequitur to the issue of Church and State realize we are talking about basic values intrinsic to humankind and on the other hand a dastardly group that has vowed to destroy those values.
In 1945 psychiatrist G. Brock Chisholm to the assembly of psychiatrists emulated J.R Rees' 1940 master plan as the guiding principle for psychiatry, their paramount aim as "reinterpretation and eventually [the] eradication of right and wrong". This arrogant agenda laid out in detail includes the dissolution of family values and religious belief as essential to accomplishment of their goals. That's the downside of this issue.
Psychiatric mainline activities, addictive narcotic psychiatric drugs, prefrontal lobotomy, insulin shock and electroshock therapy each one inflicts pain and unconsciousness. These are highly destructive activities to the body, mind and spirit of the patient. It is not healthy - mentally or physically. Besides that, these violate human rights, considering that the practices are fraudulent and have never cured anyone by psychiatry's own admission. Without rehashing the volumes of documentation behind the above statements make a note of this: where there is a keenly unfavorable activity to advance militant ethnicity, separatism and otherness particularly in religious intolerance there is, if one looks deeply enough, a psychiatrist in the woodpile.
Ethnic cleansing, that heinous fabrication of psychiatry, also could said to be, by association, religious cleansing. Advancement of humanity to humankind does not admit to another religious crusade so let's don't go there.
That the Roman Catholic Church's heavy involvement in psychiatric therapy is found in parallel with its group's moral difficulties of sexual abuse among it's priests as a present crisis issue is no wonder. I trust the Pope will work it out, if he recognizes that the undermining of values is coming from the psychiatric false data rampant in our society and the reliance of the Catholic Church on psychiatry.
Following through on Rees's master plan psychiatry has no good will towards religions. Even to this day as we witness the Child Protection racket in Texas under psychiatric rule engage in human rights violations in mass against the families of that Mormon sect.
That said my main point can be made. Central to human concourse is the recognition of human rights inclusive of the inalienable right to one's own religious practices and their performance. Our country's First Amendment groups the freedom of religion with other specific rights such as the freedom of speech while the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights lists these each separately in the 30 specifically stated rights. Unstated here but a necessary corollary is that the souls of men have the rights of men.
You can't get more basic than embracing life as that of spiritual beings, that each and every one of us is basically good and is a spiritual being, a soul or spirit, call it what you will. Psychiatrists notwithstanding (joke). Spiritual being to spiritual being it matters naught to me whether the individuals before me prefer Mohammad or Christ or Buddha or L. Ron Hubbard. I see these groupings of man pursuing the same goals: desires to advance spirituality, basic truth and the study of knowledge. This would naturally embrace the highest point from which one could view, the omniscience and omnipotence associated with God and pan determinism in the allness of all. This is the quintessential what goes around comes around.
The State, in the activities of any of its agencies, is a sovereignty that must hold its own by its might and symbology with some agreement of principles. We don't however need an army of a particular color to tell us how we can worship.
Thus anyone should be free to pursue their religious beliefs. The delineation of the inalienable human rights defines the boundaries against which the the path is directed for the furtherance of humanity to mankind.
Invest in yourself here:
______________________________________________
Winning The Tomorrow Game. Unique, In-depth Step-by-step Program For Achieving Your Dreams And Goals. Self-exploration, Dream-creation And Realization. Includes Helpful Workbook, 200+ Custom Affirmations. Click Here!____________________________________________________
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Psychiatry: The Scourge of the Universe
by Robert L. Gisel
Mental Health is important to living life. The first thing not to do for this is turn to psychiatry.
What one has to do to become a psychiatrist is to first become a medical doctor bound by the Hippocratic Oath. The first thing a medical doctor is required to do to then become a psychiatrist is to forsake that oath.
There are three requirements one must fulfill for a medical doctor to become licenced as a psychiatrist. First of all, one has to engage in electric shock therapy (ECT) on someone . Secondly, one has to perform a brain surgery, pre-frontal lobotomy or trans-orbital leucotomy. Thirdly, one has to overdose someone on drugs and bring them back to life.
Each of these are painful life-threatening actions. These are each likely cause brain damage. None of these are designed to bring about a lively, more spirited and vibrant individual, as one would expect to be the goal of genuine mental health activities. All of these are in direct opposition to the Hippocratic Oath of the medical doctor.
A person that would go on to become a psychiatrist, then, would only be one with an intention to do harm. Where a person refuses to do these things, but still wants to work in mental health, he could become a psychologist but never a psychiatrist.
Electric Shock Therapy
The ECT as a therapy is roughly the equivalent of plugging the patient into the electrical mains of the wiring in one's house. In the ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy) up to 90 volts of electrical current is simply run through the patient's body. It is very violent and has been known to break a patient's spine and teeth. That much current does disrupt brain function and causes real brain damage. No one could want this, anymore than electrocuting oneself from the current in an electrical outlet. For sure you could never glorify this with the label of mental health.
The only difference with how this is done today is the patient is thoroughly drugged during the shock therapy so there isn't so much damage to the spine and teeth and the patient is less likely to remember the event.
The intent of ECT is to bring about a docility that makes the individual more manageable. Sometimes it is used to silence a person, or to implant commands compelling a person to do harmful destructive acts. That is if the person lives through it, as there is a notable percentage of persons who simply die from ECT. This is all documented fact.
Pre-frontal Lobotomy
This has traditionally consisted of taking a sharp pointed object, such as an ice pick, and inserting it into the eye socket, past the eyeball and into the the pre-frontal lobe of the brain. Then it is stirred around around to sever tissue to create a changed personality.
Today there is an attempt to humanize this activity with an updated version that is nonetheless severely damaging to the brain and the individual. In place of an ice pick a prod is inserted past the eyeball and electricity is applied to the brain at the end of the prod to electrically fry the pre-frontal lobe. Supposedly this brings about the result in a more humane manner. It is anything but humane.
As in ECT the purpose is to create a docile and more manageable person. Sometimes it simply kills the patient.
Drug Overdose
Drugs are poisons. Too much poison kills a body. This is even so with anaesthetics which in effect place a person at the brink of death, after which he is then brought back when the drug wears off, or with a stimulant drug or adrenaline. Such periods of pain and unconsciousness record in the mind and contribute to an unhealthy mental state.
In a clinically dead state for too long one can suffer brain damage. Nearly killing someone from a drug overdose so that one can demonstrate the ability to revive someone from a death-like state is to make a human into a guinea pig. It is nothing short of deliberately abusive.
Pain and Unconsciousness
Moments of pain and unconsciousness are recorded by the mind at a subconscious, sub-awareness level. This is a very different mental activity than the function of ones alert and aware analytical mind. That one does not have apparent memory of it only contributes to a detrimental effect.
The sensory perceptions during the unconscious period are locked-in and can play back against one, irrationally recreating the conditions extant during recording of the moment of pain and unconsciousness.
Unexplained aches and pains are re-creations from earlier incidents of pain and unconsciousness. A proper address of therapy can rid the mind of those mental recordings and nullify, or erase, the effects that have been acting against an individual. When this is correctly done the person has enhanced physical and mental well being. This is a desirable goal in the interests of mental health.
Inflicting Pain and Unconsciousness
It can thus be seen that the psychiatric mainline activities inflict pain, real and mental, rather than relieve it. This is truly night and day against sane goals for the improvement of mental health. When their patient dies from the treatment, more frequent than you would suspect, this irrevocably puts an end to that person's mental health and the psychiatrist shows no remorse.
This reversal of the intent of therapeutic treatment, from life giving to pain inflicting, defies logic. One would have to be insane to engage in these destructive psychiatric practices. Very possibly that is itself why they do it.
Psychiatric Meds
The psychotropic, psychiatric drugs, such as the forerunners Prozac and Ritalin, but equally all their derivatives like Zoloft and Zyprexa, are heavy, addicting narcotics ranked on the drug tables as more potent than cocaine. The pre-release studies include side effects of increased tendency to violence and suicide as well as cardiac arrest.
Many of the psychiatric "meds" have been black box labeled to make known their potentially very harmful side effects. These side effects include severe neurological problems, acathesia (shaking), diabetes, severe heart attacks, strokes and death, not mention increased tendencies towards violence and suicide. If they don't kill you they may cause someone else to get killed. Witness the school shootings, each the act of students who had been on "meds".
False Mental Heath Diseases
Another delusion forwarded by psychiatry is that psychiatric drugs promote mental health by addressing "mental health diseases". There is no such thing.
At the annual American Psychiatric Association meeting the latest fabrications of mental health diseases are voted on by the body of psychiatrists and, when passed, that is the sole authoritative criteria.
ADHD for instance is admitted by psychiatrists to have no basis in fact or any scientific support. It was simply voted in for inclusion on the list, called the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) as a "mental health disease". It isn't. Neither is it a "disease" nor is there any factual basis of the label ADHD nor it's drug "treatment"
The actual long list of psychiatric "diseases" would be hilarious if their use by psychiatry weren't so damaging, with labels ranging from Mathematics Syndrome to Negroitus, the later being the blatantly arrogant justification for the entire US racial segregation program. With now over 3000 classifications these encompass such broadly general social behaviors they could be used to label any individual, anywhere, as having a "mental health disease", all on the opinion of the psychiatrist.
Psychiatric False Data
Psychiatry has regularly promoted their activities as quite the opposite of what they are: highly destructive. The psychiatric profession by its own admission has never cured anyone using ECT, brain surgery and narcotic drugging. This is meant to dupe others as to the real situation because big dollars are paid for these psychiatric practices.
Early on it was even promoted as fashionable to see a psychiatrist, all the while never was the truth disclosed of the damaging practices. Only the psychiatric false data was advanced and sold to an unsuspecting public.
The truth about it is, the practices are fraudulent and criminal, while hanging onto a bare thread of legalized legitimacy.
Staying Out of the Hands of the Psychiatrists
It should be a hard and fast rule of all that one must, despite whatever blows the vagaries of life may have delivered, no matter what, stay out of the hands of psychiatry. Don't permit this barbarism to be conducted on your family, friends and humankind. This can take some doing as in some quarters the laws favor coercive involuntary treatment.
As a steadfast rule refuse to permit any and all psychiatric treatments always, wherever possible, and seek sane alternatives. Inform your friends and family of this intention so they have your back lest some misinformed psychiatrist attempt to declare you, or someone close to you, incompetent, so as to override ones will. Good friends and family can intervene where they know to do so.
Some day the full truth will reach to all areas to make it broadly known what a scourge psychiatry has become. For now it is best to have your defenses up regarding this phony profession.
Robert L. Gisel is a writer and a professor of Scientology.
Mental Health is important to living life. The first thing not to do for this is turn to psychiatry.
What one has to do to become a psychiatrist is to first become a medical doctor bound by the Hippocratic Oath. The first thing a medical doctor is required to do to then become a psychiatrist is to forsake that oath.
There are three requirements one must fulfill for a medical doctor to become licenced as a psychiatrist. First of all, one has to engage in electric shock therapy (ECT) on someone . Secondly, one has to perform a brain surgery, pre-frontal lobotomy or trans-orbital leucotomy. Thirdly, one has to overdose someone on drugs and bring them back to life.
Each of these are painful life-threatening actions. These are each likely cause brain damage. None of these are designed to bring about a lively, more spirited and vibrant individual, as one would expect to be the goal of genuine mental health activities. All of these are in direct opposition to the Hippocratic Oath of the medical doctor.
A person that would go on to become a psychiatrist, then, would only be one with an intention to do harm. Where a person refuses to do these things, but still wants to work in mental health, he could become a psychologist but never a psychiatrist.
Electric Shock Therapy
The ECT as a therapy is roughly the equivalent of plugging the patient into the electrical mains of the wiring in one's house. In the ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy) up to 90 volts of electrical current is simply run through the patient's body. It is very violent and has been known to break a patient's spine and teeth. That much current does disrupt brain function and causes real brain damage. No one could want this, anymore than electrocuting oneself from the current in an electrical outlet. For sure you could never glorify this with the label of mental health.
The only difference with how this is done today is the patient is thoroughly drugged during the shock therapy so there isn't so much damage to the spine and teeth and the patient is less likely to remember the event.
The intent of ECT is to bring about a docility that makes the individual more manageable. Sometimes it is used to silence a person, or to implant commands compelling a person to do harmful destructive acts. That is if the person lives through it, as there is a notable percentage of persons who simply die from ECT. This is all documented fact.
Pre-frontal Lobotomy
This has traditionally consisted of taking a sharp pointed object, such as an ice pick, and inserting it into the eye socket, past the eyeball and into the the pre-frontal lobe of the brain. Then it is stirred around around to sever tissue to create a changed personality.
Today there is an attempt to humanize this activity with an updated version that is nonetheless severely damaging to the brain and the individual. In place of an ice pick a prod is inserted past the eyeball and electricity is applied to the brain at the end of the prod to electrically fry the pre-frontal lobe. Supposedly this brings about the result in a more humane manner. It is anything but humane.
As in ECT the purpose is to create a docile and more manageable person. Sometimes it simply kills the patient.
Drug Overdose
Drugs are poisons. Too much poison kills a body. This is even so with anaesthetics which in effect place a person at the brink of death, after which he is then brought back when the drug wears off, or with a stimulant drug or adrenaline. Such periods of pain and unconsciousness record in the mind and contribute to an unhealthy mental state.
In a clinically dead state for too long one can suffer brain damage. Nearly killing someone from a drug overdose so that one can demonstrate the ability to revive someone from a death-like state is to make a human into a guinea pig. It is nothing short of deliberately abusive.
Pain and Unconsciousness
Moments of pain and unconsciousness are recorded by the mind at a subconscious, sub-awareness level. This is a very different mental activity than the function of ones alert and aware analytical mind. That one does not have apparent memory of it only contributes to a detrimental effect.
The sensory perceptions during the unconscious period are locked-in and can play back against one, irrationally recreating the conditions extant during recording of the moment of pain and unconsciousness.
Unexplained aches and pains are re-creations from earlier incidents of pain and unconsciousness. A proper address of therapy can rid the mind of those mental recordings and nullify, or erase, the effects that have been acting against an individual. When this is correctly done the person has enhanced physical and mental well being. This is a desirable goal in the interests of mental health.
Inflicting Pain and Unconsciousness
It can thus be seen that the psychiatric mainline activities inflict pain, real and mental, rather than relieve it. This is truly night and day against sane goals for the improvement of mental health. When their patient dies from the treatment, more frequent than you would suspect, this irrevocably puts an end to that person's mental health and the psychiatrist shows no remorse.
This reversal of the intent of therapeutic treatment, from life giving to pain inflicting, defies logic. One would have to be insane to engage in these destructive psychiatric practices. Very possibly that is itself why they do it.
Psychiatric Meds
The psychotropic, psychiatric drugs, such as the forerunners Prozac and Ritalin, but equally all their derivatives like Zoloft and Zyprexa, are heavy, addicting narcotics ranked on the drug tables as more potent than cocaine. The pre-release studies include side effects of increased tendency to violence and suicide as well as cardiac arrest.
Many of the psychiatric "meds" have been black box labeled to make known their potentially very harmful side effects. These side effects include severe neurological problems, acathesia (shaking), diabetes, severe heart attacks, strokes and death, not mention increased tendencies towards violence and suicide. If they don't kill you they may cause someone else to get killed. Witness the school shootings, each the act of students who had been on "meds".
False Mental Heath Diseases
Another delusion forwarded by psychiatry is that psychiatric drugs promote mental health by addressing "mental health diseases". There is no such thing.
At the annual American Psychiatric Association meeting the latest fabrications of mental health diseases are voted on by the body of psychiatrists and, when passed, that is the sole authoritative criteria.
ADHD for instance is admitted by psychiatrists to have no basis in fact or any scientific support. It was simply voted in for inclusion on the list, called the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) as a "mental health disease". It isn't. Neither is it a "disease" nor is there any factual basis of the label ADHD nor it's drug "treatment"
The actual long list of psychiatric "diseases" would be hilarious if their use by psychiatry weren't so damaging, with labels ranging from Mathematics Syndrome to Negroitus, the later being the blatantly arrogant justification for the entire US racial segregation program. With now over 3000 classifications these encompass such broadly general social behaviors they could be used to label any individual, anywhere, as having a "mental health disease", all on the opinion of the psychiatrist.
Psychiatric False Data
Psychiatry has regularly promoted their activities as quite the opposite of what they are: highly destructive. The psychiatric profession by its own admission has never cured anyone using ECT, brain surgery and narcotic drugging. This is meant to dupe others as to the real situation because big dollars are paid for these psychiatric practices.
Early on it was even promoted as fashionable to see a psychiatrist, all the while never was the truth disclosed of the damaging practices. Only the psychiatric false data was advanced and sold to an unsuspecting public.
The truth about it is, the practices are fraudulent and criminal, while hanging onto a bare thread of legalized legitimacy.
Staying Out of the Hands of the Psychiatrists
It should be a hard and fast rule of all that one must, despite whatever blows the vagaries of life may have delivered, no matter what, stay out of the hands of psychiatry. Don't permit this barbarism to be conducted on your family, friends and humankind. This can take some doing as in some quarters the laws favor coercive involuntary treatment.
As a steadfast rule refuse to permit any and all psychiatric treatments always, wherever possible, and seek sane alternatives. Inform your friends and family of this intention so they have your back lest some misinformed psychiatrist attempt to declare you, or someone close to you, incompetent, so as to override ones will. Good friends and family can intervene where they know to do so.
Some day the full truth will reach to all areas to make it broadly known what a scourge psychiatry has become. For now it is best to have your defenses up regarding this phony profession.
Robert L. Gisel is a writer and a professor of Scientology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
