by Robert L. Gisel
An antisocial person can be expected to shoot the wrong target. This is an evidently unknown behavior trait that is destroying fair play in our schools.
In a Delaware school a first grader is given 45 days suspension for bringing his favorite camping utensils to school to eat his lunch. He is an alive, bright, and high IQ lad, I'd say, judging by his photo look. He looks a lot like myself as a first grader, when I topped all third graders in the county on my SAT scores.
Even then I was guilty in a first grade incident of bringing guns to school. Playing with my favorite 2-gun holsters, cap guns I won in the church bingo game, I forget I'm wearing these when I get on the school bus. At school, to cover up my embarrassment, I hide them behind the hot water heater in the basement. Great plan, until the teacher decided to have the students all help clean the basement for the upcoming box lunch raffle. When these are found and the question is put forth whose are these, in front of the entire school body I have to admit they are mine. Very embarrassing moment.
In today's school district I would have been suspended from school or expelled for bringing guns into the school. Zachary Christie, 6, was suspended for 45 days and relegated to the alternative school for grossly bad kids. All Zachory wanted was to eat his lunch with special three-way knife-fork-spoon utensil. Actually, I'm surprised he wasn't arrested, the way attitudes have degenerated so far in our school system.
A friend reminded me recently that when we were in Junior High in Alaska we'd watch the High Schoolers bring their guns to school for the fully sanctioned Rifle Club. I almost joined that one myself but was too busy working after school, participating in the bowling club and performing in our dance band and also a folk group. These students though, they'd walk into the school carrying their rifles which they would store in their school lockers until time for the Club meet. Then they'd take their guns out of their lockers and carry them through the Junior High School to the basement rifle range.
Try that today with Security standing guard at the door with metal detector screening and frisking. How did it get so crazy? Psyche influence.
This is a stark new reality previously unviewed. The sequence goes like this:
1) Trying to study past misunderstood word and concepts,
2) Nervous and other non-optimum reactions occur,
3) For which the psychiatrist gives a bogus prognosis of ADHD or ADD,
4) This is always followed by a prescription for psychotropic drugs,
5) Which cause more violent reactions like suicide or school shootings and
6) Now the school grounds are placed under martial law and cloaked in an atmosphere of intolerance.
There are very real physiological reactions proven to result from barriers to study. Studying past misunderstood and undefined words causes disinterest, a not-there-ness, and blankness. One can feel washed-out with a nervous sort of hysteria. After numbers of such bypassed definitions one gets pretty detached, starts looking out the window and then gets rather irritable, even quite critical of the subject and the area of the subject and you want to blow from the premises. Sound familiar?
The psychiatric solution is to label the student on the spot. With no testing or scientific support of any kind whatsoever. This process is so arbitrary it is genuinely crazy.
The handling is simple: ban the fraudulent psyches from the schools and refuse to allow psychotropic drugging of the students. Implement a scientifically correct study technology. Our schools would calm instantly and common sense would again prevail.
Zachary's mother refused to let him be degraded by the ready injustice at the school. My hat is off to her.
Showing posts with label Psychotropic Psych Drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Psychotropic Psych Drugs. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Questions for the President
by Robert L. Gisel
Another email came to me from the President. These emails from "Barack Obama" make one feel important, even if it's really only from Mitch, his promoter, and I'm just one recipient amongst multimilions. However, since I never receive any personal replies to my direct reply letters to Mr. Obama I post my letters on my blog so I know it gets seen by someone anyway.
Here is my latest letter, intended for, but possibly never to be seen by the President.
To: Mitch Stewart, BarackObama.com
Subject: Ask the President a health care question
Dear Mitch,
Lest I do not have an opportunity to record and post a video, you can see my input in the blog post below.
http://favoringlife.blogspot.com/2009/07/until-death-do-us-part.html
By the way, I know that the psyche-drugs in question don't do nothing. They do make the recipients more docile and controllable. If that is one's intention then there you go. At the risk of losing creativity, vibrant life and dynamic future leaders. You can see I don't think very highly of these and don't mince my words.
At the risk of unbearable candor and forthrightness, is Barack Obama on psychiatric drugs? I realize this a very personal and maybe biting question. But seriously, has he ever taken these psychotropic drugs? Are his children, or their school chums, on them? Would you take them, knowing the published, dangerous, side effects, such as ideation of suicide and homocide, sudden unexplained death and health problems?
This is relevant to the issue of more affordable health care as the billions budgeted for psychiatric programs in the schools and other health care programs to forward the use of psychotropic narcotics are wasted funds. Funds that could be used to provide more general family heath care. And yes, it is a matter of life or death, so who cares about the whines of psychiatrists having their fraudulent budgets cut.
My concern is genuine, albiet frankly direct. Perhaps you might give me your feedback and even advise the President that change is wanted. And possible. It is not from one voice that I speak to you.
Respectfully yours,
Robert L. Gisel
Another email came to me from the President. These emails from "Barack Obama" make one feel important, even if it's really only from Mitch, his promoter, and I'm just one recipient amongst multimilions. However, since I never receive any personal replies to my direct reply letters to Mr. Obama I post my letters on my blog so I know it gets seen by someone anyway.
Here is my latest letter, intended for, but possibly never to be seen by the President.
To: Mitch Stewart, BarackObama.com
Subject: Ask the President a health care question
Dear Mitch,
Lest I do not have an opportunity to record and post a video, you can see my input in the blog post below.
http://favoringlife.blogspot.com/2009/07/until-death-do-us-part.html
By the way, I know that the psyche-drugs in question don't do nothing. They do make the recipients more docile and controllable. If that is one's intention then there you go. At the risk of losing creativity, vibrant life and dynamic future leaders. You can see I don't think very highly of these and don't mince my words.
At the risk of unbearable candor and forthrightness, is Barack Obama on psychiatric drugs? I realize this a very personal and maybe biting question. But seriously, has he ever taken these psychotropic drugs? Are his children, or their school chums, on them? Would you take them, knowing the published, dangerous, side effects, such as ideation of suicide and homocide, sudden unexplained death and health problems?
This is relevant to the issue of more affordable health care as the billions budgeted for psychiatric programs in the schools and other health care programs to forward the use of psychotropic narcotics are wasted funds. Funds that could be used to provide more general family heath care. And yes, it is a matter of life or death, so who cares about the whines of psychiatrists having their fraudulent budgets cut.
My concern is genuine, albiet frankly direct. Perhaps you might give me your feedback and even advise the President that change is wanted. And possible. It is not from one voice that I speak to you.
Respectfully yours,
Robert L. Gisel
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
The Grim Scoreboard
by Robert L Gisel
Just in, this shocking bit of data was released:
And from CCHR [Citizens Commission on Human Rights]:
“One in every 5 American children take psychiatric medication. TWENTY MILLION CHILDREN around the world are prescribed psychoactive drugs.”
“Every day 100,000,000 (one hundred million) people take psychiatric drugs.”
“50% of all Americans who commit suicide are on psychiatric drugs.”
Not to worry, if our nations enemies can wait long enough we'll kill ourselves off, thanks to the helpful hand of psychiatry.
Much has been written, not simply by myself but many expert professionals, on the nature of the "meds" so willingly given. About how they rank on the drug tables for their narcotic potency and psychotropic effects in a category alongside morphine and heroin. How the side affects give kids heart attacks and other severe health problems, not mention how it causes propensity to murder and suicide as just another tidy "little" side effect.
Not all kids on the psyche-drugs will have a heart attack but probably all children with heart attacks will be found to be on psyche-drugs. One for one the school shootings we hear of in the news have been by persons who have been on one or more psyche-drugs, Ritalin, Prozac, Zoloft and the lengthy stream of in-kind derivatives. These are the documented facts.
School age children, the elderly, women with PMS, anyone feeling a bit off or depressed and now pregnant women all are targeted by the psychiatrists as candidates for their addiction. The list is growing like a plague. Forget the supposed salmonella outbreaks; psychiatry really kills in droves.
Put all together one views a deliberate trend. Look behind the effect to cause as who profits, not simply monetarily. Big Pharma, yes, but are they even that stupidly evil? Someone behind this out-of-control movement expects to gain some advantage by putting the nation entire on debilitating, addictive drugs. A population docile facilitates control. Don't think for a minute it isn't anything less intended by some mad dog antisocial personalities.
The question is, will our alive and fighting spirits, free beings and freedom minded individuals have sufficient courage and numbers to do something effective enough to stop it before it destroys the greatness of our country?
Just in, this shocking bit of data was released:
And from CCHR [Citizens Commission on Human Rights]:
“One in every 5 American children take psychiatric medication. TWENTY MILLION CHILDREN around the world are prescribed psychoactive drugs.”
“Every day 100,000,000 (one hundred million) people take psychiatric drugs.”
“50% of all Americans who commit suicide are on psychiatric drugs.”
Not to worry, if our nations enemies can wait long enough we'll kill ourselves off, thanks to the helpful hand of psychiatry.
Much has been written, not simply by myself but many expert professionals, on the nature of the "meds" so willingly given. About how they rank on the drug tables for their narcotic potency and psychotropic effects in a category alongside morphine and heroin. How the side affects give kids heart attacks and other severe health problems, not mention how it causes propensity to murder and suicide as just another tidy "little" side effect.
Not all kids on the psyche-drugs will have a heart attack but probably all children with heart attacks will be found to be on psyche-drugs. One for one the school shootings we hear of in the news have been by persons who have been on one or more psyche-drugs, Ritalin, Prozac, Zoloft and the lengthy stream of in-kind derivatives. These are the documented facts.
School age children, the elderly, women with PMS, anyone feeling a bit off or depressed and now pregnant women all are targeted by the psychiatrists as candidates for their addiction. The list is growing like a plague. Forget the supposed salmonella outbreaks; psychiatry really kills in droves.
Put all together one views a deliberate trend. Look behind the effect to cause as who profits, not simply monetarily. Big Pharma, yes, but are they even that stupidly evil? Someone behind this out-of-control movement expects to gain some advantage by putting the nation entire on debilitating, addictive drugs. A population docile facilitates control. Don't think for a minute it isn't anything less intended by some mad dog antisocial personalities.
The question is, will our alive and fighting spirits, free beings and freedom minded individuals have sufficient courage and numbers to do something effective enough to stop it before it destroys the greatness of our country?
Friday, January 30, 2009
Would-Be Suicide Bomber: Psychiatry's Latest Product
by Robert L. Gisel
A British subject who has a failed attempt at suicide bombing gets a minimum of 18 years sentence. The psychiatrist, whose hands he had been in and undoubtedly had him on their "meds" (addictive psychotropic drugs) evidently goes unheeded, as apparently do the two agents provocateurs.
This arrest and conviction of Nicky Reilly, 22, is high profile due to the subject matter and the uncleverness of this person who was a self proclaimed follower of Islam on a mission protest discimination against Muslims in England. It was undoubtedly selected as a feature for that reason and includes only a one-liner stating the Police have noted that he had been "preyed upon, radicalized and taken advantage of". This is referencing to the two persons, from a "radical website", who encouraged and assisted him in this plot by email.
There is no mention of these two are being sought for collusion and conspiracy to the terrorist act, agents provacateurs, but this would be the logical conclusion, the Police in England priding themselves on their Sherlock Holmes-like investigatory abilities.
A connection that appears to have been missed is the psychiatrist in whose hands Reilly was being "treated" for autism and Aspergers syndrome. No doubt he was in treatment for the previous suicide attempt as well. The current suicide bombing attempt thus is following psychiatric treatment and, by the record of results of psychiatric practices, is cause for suspicion of being psychiatric malpractice and mis-drugging.
Psychiatry has a very high death and suicide rate, for which the practitioner will invariably claim "He came to us too late". This is from all of its range of "therapies" from psychoanalysis to ECT shock therapy. The patient is invariably, usually immediate on cursory examination, placed on one or more psychiatric drugs, arbitrarily selected from a string of derivatives all having generally the same side effects of increased tendency to suicide and violence.
One has to assume the psychiatrist knows he is doing this as the side effects and the results are well known. This means the psychiatric practitioner is highly suspect as a perpetrator and should be investigated for his responsibility in the attempted suicide bombing.
This was not Reilly's first attempted suicide. The first act of a psychiatrist, always brought in on any attempted suicide, is to prescribe the patient addictive narcotic psych-drugs. Valium, Ritalin and Prozac are the principle and most notorious of these dangerous drugs.
As these drugs gained much bad press the drug companies then switched the formulas slightly to produce a long string of derivatives with the same harmful side effects. Some have been black box labeled by the FDA to warn of the side effects which are suicide, violence, heart attacks and others. However, the FDA has not kept up with the flood of new drugs to the market. There are now over 75 brands of psych-drugs. These are not mild, rank alongside Heroine and Morphine as to their narcotic, psychotropic, and addictive potencies on the medical drug tables.
and had been helped in the plot by two unidentified people who contacted him on an extremist website.
It is common and expected to find at the inception of any acts of this nature, protest bombings, riots, uprisings and outbreaks in war, a person or persons behind the scenes inciting the action. This is well known and commonly named in war espionage as agents provocateurs. Funny thing is that psychiatrists are notorious for advising patient under treatment to go and dramatize their discreditable acts so as to not be burdened by its compelling inhibition anymore. It would appear Reilly was duped on both sides, the psychiatrist and the agents provocateurs.
Now, he is for it, as having taken the action he is guilty of the crime and pays the price. But where is the investigation of the perpetrators, who unhampered will do it again with other unsuspecting dupes?
A British subject who has a failed attempt at suicide bombing gets a minimum of 18 years sentence. The psychiatrist, whose hands he had been in and undoubtedly had him on their "meds" (addictive psychotropic drugs) evidently goes unheeded, as apparently do the two agents provocateurs.
This arrest and conviction of Nicky Reilly, 22, is high profile due to the subject matter and the uncleverness of this person who was a self proclaimed follower of Islam on a mission protest discimination against Muslims in England. It was undoubtedly selected as a feature for that reason and includes only a one-liner stating the Police have noted that he had been "preyed upon, radicalized and taken advantage of". This is referencing to the two persons, from a "radical website", who encouraged and assisted him in this plot by email.
There is no mention of these two are being sought for collusion and conspiracy to the terrorist act, agents provacateurs, but this would be the logical conclusion, the Police in England priding themselves on their Sherlock Holmes-like investigatory abilities.
A connection that appears to have been missed is the psychiatrist in whose hands Reilly was being "treated" for autism and Aspergers syndrome. No doubt he was in treatment for the previous suicide attempt as well. The current suicide bombing attempt thus is following psychiatric treatment and, by the record of results of psychiatric practices, is cause for suspicion of being psychiatric malpractice and mis-drugging.
Psychiatry has a very high death and suicide rate, for which the practitioner will invariably claim "He came to us too late". This is from all of its range of "therapies" from psychoanalysis to ECT shock therapy. The patient is invariably, usually immediate on cursory examination, placed on one or more psychiatric drugs, arbitrarily selected from a string of derivatives all having generally the same side effects of increased tendency to suicide and violence.
One has to assume the psychiatrist knows he is doing this as the side effects and the results are well known. This means the psychiatric practitioner is highly suspect as a perpetrator and should be investigated for his responsibility in the attempted suicide bombing.
This was not Reilly's first attempted suicide. The first act of a psychiatrist, always brought in on any attempted suicide, is to prescribe the patient addictive narcotic psych-drugs. Valium, Ritalin and Prozac are the principle and most notorious of these dangerous drugs.
As these drugs gained much bad press the drug companies then switched the formulas slightly to produce a long string of derivatives with the same harmful side effects. Some have been black box labeled by the FDA to warn of the side effects which are suicide, violence, heart attacks and others. However, the FDA has not kept up with the flood of new drugs to the market. There are now over 75 brands of psych-drugs. These are not mild, rank alongside Heroine and Morphine as to their narcotic, psychotropic, and addictive potencies on the medical drug tables.
and had been helped in the plot by two unidentified people who contacted him on an extremist website.
It is common and expected to find at the inception of any acts of this nature, protest bombings, riots, uprisings and outbreaks in war, a person or persons behind the scenes inciting the action. This is well known and commonly named in war espionage as agents provocateurs. Funny thing is that psychiatrists are notorious for advising patient under treatment to go and dramatize their discreditable acts so as to not be burdened by its compelling inhibition anymore. It would appear Reilly was duped on both sides, the psychiatrist and the agents provocateurs.
Now, he is for it, as having taken the action he is guilty of the crime and pays the price. But where is the investigation of the perpetrators, who unhampered will do it again with other unsuspecting dupes?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
